Home / Compare / Grok vs Llama

Grok vs Llama

In short: Llama is not listed on LMArena, so no independent quality comparison is possible; on our editorial score Grok comes out higher, Llama is stronger on privacy and GDPR, and Llama's entry price is not public.

GrokxAI
1471EloGDPR: Caution

2 of 7 criteria with a clear difference

vs
LlamaMeta
–EloGDPR: Caution

5 of 7 criteria with a clear difference

GrokThe showdownLlama
1640Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure1528
7.8Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. An assessment, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure7.6
$6Price out per 1M (lower is better)$4.25

A bar fills towards the model's side; yellow is a clear difference, grey falls within the margin of measurement.

CriterionGrokLlama
Quality (Elo)Quality from blind duels on LMArena: users choose between two anonymous answers. A difference of about 20 points is noticeable, a few points is noise. How we measure1471–
Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. This is a judgement, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure7,8 / 107,6 / 10
Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure16401528
API price in, per 1M$2$1.25
API price out, per 1M$6$4.25
Entry price (subscription)$10 / monthon request
Businesson requeston request
Context window500K tokens (Grok 4.7)up to 10M tokens
ModalitiesText, Image, CodeText, Image, Code
EU hostingNoYes
Self-hostableNoYes
No training (business)NoYes
GDPR profileOur summary of what the provider itself publishes about your data. For a professional tool: whether the data is stored in the EU, whether there is a certification or GDPR guarantee, and whether the provider is based in the Netherlands or the EU. For a general model: EU hosting, no training on your data and self-hosting. From Strong to Unknown; Caution only for a model with a documented problem. How we measureCautionCaution

Source: LMArena, OpenRouter · retrieved 9 November 2026

Choose Grok if…

  • real-time X/Twitter and web data matters to you
  • a DeepSearch research agent matters to you

Choose Llama if…

  • open weights that you can fully self-host matter to you
  • fine-tuning on your own data matters to you
  • privacy and GDPR weigh heavily

Frequently asked questions

By field

Which is better: Grok or Llama?

On combined quality (LMArena Elo plus our editorial score), Grok comes out higher, but the right choice depends on your field and requirements: Llama may suit you better on price or privacy. See the table above.

Which is better for privacy and GDPR: Grok or Llama?

Llama scores higher here (EU hosting, on-premise and no training on your data). Grok: no EU data residency; data goes to the US under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. X/Grok uses public posts and conversations for training by default, with an opt-out. Subject of a GDPR investigation by the Irish DPC.

Which is cheaper: Grok or Llama?

The entry prices are close together. Always check the current prices, as they change often.

Every Friday: what changed in AI for your field

New models, prices, oversight and tools, with sources and what it means for you. One email a week, unsubscribe with one click.

View a sample

We only use your address for this newsletter. You confirm first by email.