Home / Compare / Grok vs Kimi

Grok vs Kimi

In short: Kimi comes out higher on quality (Elo and editorial score combined), Kimi is stronger on privacy and GDPR, and Grok is cheaper to get started with.

GrokxAI
1471EloGDPR: Caution

3 of 6 criteria with a clear difference

vs
KimiMoonshot AI
1487EloGDPR: Caution

3 of 6 criteria with a clear difference

GrokThe showdownKimi
1471Quality (Elo)Quality from blind duels on LMArena: users choose between two anonymous answers. You notice a difference of about 20 points; a few points is noise. How we measure1487
1640Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure1687
7.8Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. An assessment, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure7.6
$6Price out per 1M (lower is better)$10

A bar fills towards the model's side; yellow is a clear difference, grey falls within the margin of measurement.

CriterionGrokKimi
Quality (Elo)Quality from blind duels on LMArena: users choose between two anonymous answers. A difference of about 20 points is noticeable, a few points is noise. How we measure14711487
Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. This is a judgement, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure7,8 / 107,6 / 10
Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure16401687
API price in, per 1M$2$2
API price out, per 1M$6$10
Entry price (subscription)$10 / month$19 / month
Businesson requeston request
Context window500K tokens (Grok 4.7)1M tokens
ModalitiesText, Image, CodeText, Image, Video
EU hostingNoNo
Self-hostableNoYes
No training (business)NoNo
GDPR profileOur summary of what the provider itself publishes about your data. For a professional tool: whether the data is stored in the EU, whether there is a certification or GDPR guarantee, and whether the provider is based in the Netherlands or the EU. For a general model: EU hosting, no training on your data and self-hosting. From Strong to Unknown; Caution only for a model with a documented problem. How we measureCautionCaution

Source: LMArena, OpenRouter · retrieved 9 November 2026

Choose Grok if…

  • real-time X/Twitter and web data matters to you
  • a DeepSearch research agent matters to you
  • price is a decisive factor

Choose Kimi if…

  • self-hosting your flagship K3 (2.8T parameters, 1M context) and open-weight K2.6 matters to you
  • being multimodal, with text, image and video in one architecture, matters to you
  • you want the highest overall quality
  • privacy and GDPR weigh heavily

Frequently asked questions

By field

Which is better: Grok or Kimi?

On combined quality (LMArena Elo + our editorial score), Kimi comes out higher, but the right choice depends on your field and requirements: Grok may suit you better on price or privacy. See the table above.

Which is better for privacy and GDPR: Grok or Kimi?

Kimi scores higher here (EU hosting, on-premise and no training on your data). Grok: no EU data residency; data goes to the US under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. X/Grok uses public posts and conversations for training by default, with opt-out. Subject of GDPR investigation by the Irish DPC.

Which is cheaper: Grok or Kimi?

Grok has the lowest entry price. Always check current prices, as they change often.

Every Friday: what changed in AI for your field

New models, prices, oversight and tools, with sources and what it means for you. One email a week, unsubscribe with one click.

View a sample

We only use your address for this newsletter. You confirm first by email.