Home / Compare / ChatGPT vs Llama

ChatGPT vs Llama

In short: Llama is not on LMArena, so independent quality cannot be compared; on our editorial score ChatGPT comes out higher, Llama is stronger on privacy and GDPR, and the entry price of Llama is not public.

ChatGPTOpenAI
1485EloGDPR: Strong

3 of 6 criteria with a clear difference

vs
LlamaMeta
–EloGDPR: Caution

3 of 6 criteria with a clear difference

ChatGPTThe showdownLlama
1767Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure1526
8.9Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. An assessment, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure7.6
$50Price out per 1M (lower is better)$4.25

A bar fills towards the model's side; yellow is a clear difference, grey falls within the margin of measurement.

CriterionChatGPTLlama
Quality (Elo)Quality from blind duels on LMArena: users choose between two anonymous answers. A difference of about 20 points is noticeable, a few points is noise. How we measure1485–
Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. This is a judgement, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure8,9 / 107,6 / 10
Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure17671526
API price in, per 1M$10$1.25
API price out, per 1M$50$4.25
Entry price (subscription)$8 / monthon request
Businessfrom $20 / seat (Business / API)on request
Context window~1M tokensup to 10M tokens
ModalitiesText, Image, Speech, CodeText, Image, Code
EU hostingYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
No training (business)YesYes
GDPR profileOur summary of what the provider itself publishes about your data. For a professional tool: whether the data is stored in the EU, whether there is a certification or GDPR guarantee, and whether the provider is based in the Netherlands or the EU. For a general model: EU hosting, no training on your data and self-hosting. From Strong to Unknown; Caution only for a model with a documented problem. How we measureStrongCaution

Source: LMArena, OpenRouter · retrieved 10 November 2026

Choose ChatGPT if…

  • you consider versatility across a wide range of tasks important
  • you consider strength in agentic coding and debugging important

Choose Llama if…

  • open weights that you can fully self-host matter to you
  • fine-tuning on your own data matters to you
  • privacy and GDPR weigh heavily

Frequently asked questions

By field

Which is better: ChatGPT or Llama?

On combined quality (LMArena Elo + our editorial score), ChatGPT comes out higher, but the right choice depends on your field and requirements: Llama may suit you better on price or privacy. See the table above.

Which is better for privacy and GDPR: ChatGPT or Llama?

Llama scores higher here (EU hosting, on-premise and no training on your data). ChatGPT: EU data residency is available for Enterprise, Edu and the API. Business and API data are not used for training by default; consumer tiers (Free/Plus/Pro) are, unless you turn this off.

Which is cheaper: ChatGPT or Llama?

The entry prices are close together. Always check the current prices, as they change often.

Every Friday: what changed in AI for your field

New models, prices, oversight and tools, with sources and what it means for you. One email a week, unsubscribe with one click.

View a sample

We only use your address for this newsletter. You confirm first by email.