Home / Safety / Perplexity for research & science
Perplexity AIHow safe is Perplexity for research & science?
The maker of Perplexity publishes little about data protection. Ask about this before you put confidential research & science data into it.
Where does Perplexity stand in research & science?
Shared spot 20 of 30 options for research & science (professional tools and general assistants) on GDPR profile. 4 options, like Perplexity, have an unknown profile. Each tile is an option we track for this field; click for the check.
Published safeguards
None of these three found in what the provider publishes; what is there, you can read below. Know more? Report it
Enterprise plans and the Sonar API are not trained on customer data (SOC 2 Type II; API with zero data retention). For consumer accounts, data use for model improvement can be switched off in the settings.
How to use Perplexity safely
- Use the business variant and sign a data processing agreement (DPA).
- Do not enter unnecessary personal data into prompts; anonymise where possible.
- Ask the provider explicitly where data is stored and processed.
- Keep a professional in the loop: never use AI as a source: every reference must be traceable to the original article, as invented or misattributed citations are the most common error.
Stronger or equally strong in research & science
Questions
- How safe is Perplexity for research & science?
- The maker of Perplexity publishes little about data protection. Ask about this before you put confidential research & science data into it. The provider publishes little on this, ask about it before business use.
- Does Perplexity train on my data?
- Enterprise plans and the Sonar API are not trained on customer data (SOC 2 Type II; API with zero data retention). For consumer accounts, data use for model improvement can be switched off in the settings.
- What should I look out for with AI in research & science?
- Never use AI as a source: every reference must be traceable to the original article, as fabricated or wrongly attributed citations are the most common error. Unpublished data, research proposals and peer-review manuscripts are confidential or commercially sensitive, so do not enter them into a consumer account without a data processing agreement, and check whether the provider stores your input or uses it for training (publishers usually prohibit this explicitly for peer review). If you work with personal data from research participants, the GDPR and your own ethics review apply: running models locally or using an EU-hosted tool with data minimisation is then the safe route. Finally, document your search strategy and your AI use: journals and funders increasingly ask for this, and a review must remain reproducible.
Source documents
Everything about Perplexity Best AI for research & science
Summarised by the editorial team from provider documentation · not legal advice
Last checked: 29 October 2026 · How we check
Source: , checked on 29 October 2026
Every Friday: what changed in AI for research & science
New models, prices, oversight and tools, with sources and what it means for you. One email a week, unsubscribe with one click.




























