Home / Safety / Covidence for research & science

Veritas Health Innovation Ltd (Melbourne, Australia)

How safe is Covidence for research & science?

GDPR profileOur summary of what the provider itself publishes about your data: whether the data is held in the EU (2 points), whether there is a certification or GDPR safeguard (1) and whether the provider is based in the NL or the EU (1). 3 or 4 points is Strong, 2 Good, 1 Limited, 0 Unknown. How we measure for research & scienceLimited

Covidence publishes limited privacy safeguards. Ask the provider for clarification before you put confidential research & science data into it.

Where does Covidence stand in research & science?

Shared spot 12 of 30 options for research & science (professional tools and general assistants) on the GDPR profile. 8 options, like Covidence's profile, have Limited ratings. Each tile is an option we track for this field; click for the check.

Strong5
Good6
Limited8
Unknown4
Caution7

Stronger or equally strong in research & science

Questions

How safe is Covidence for research & science?
Covidence publishes limited privacy safeguards. Ask the provider for clarification before you put confidential research & science data into it. Limited or partly unclear safeguards, ask the provider.
Does Covidence train on my data?
The identity of the LLM provider used is not public; Covidence states that the LLMs it uses do not store, distribute or use uploaded full-text PDFs for training. The organisation calls itself the GDPR controller, but data may be stored outside the EU.
What should I look out for with AI in research & science?
Never use AI as a source: every reference must be traceable to the original article, as fabricated or wrongly attributed citations are the most common error. Unpublished data, research proposals and peer-review manuscripts are confidential or commercially sensitive, so do not enter them into a consumer account without a data processing agreement, and check whether the provider stores your input or uses it for training (publishers usually prohibit this explicitly for peer review). If you work with personal data from research participants, the GDPR and your own ethics review apply: running models locally or using an EU-hosted tool with data minimisation is then the safe route. Finally, document your search strategy and your AI use: journals and funders increasingly ask for this, and a review must remain reproducible.

Source documents

Everything about Covidence Best AI for research & science

Summarised by the editorial team from provider documentation · not legal advice

Last checked: 15 October 2026 · How we check

Every Friday: what changed in AI for research & science

New models, prices, oversight and tools, with sources and what it means for you. One email a week, unsubscribe with one click.

View a sample

We only use your address for this newsletter. You confirm first by email.