Home / Compare / Llama vs Qwen

Llama vs Qwen

In short: Llama is not on LMArena, so no independent quality comparison is possible; on our editorial score Qwen comes out higher, Llama is stronger on privacy and GDPR, and the entry prices of Llama and Qwen are not public.

LlamaMeta
–EloGDPR: Caution

3 of 5 criteria with a clear difference

vs
QwenAlibaba Cloud
1484EloGDPR: Caution

2 of 5 criteria with a clear difference

LlamaThe showdownQwen
1528Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure1677
7.6Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. An assessment, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure7.9
$4.25Price out per 1M (lower is better)$6

A bar fills towards the model's side; yellow is a clear difference, grey falls within the margin of measurement.

CriterionLlamaQwen
Quality (Elo)Quality from blind duels on LMArena: users choose between two anonymous answers. A difference of about 20 points is noticeable, a few points is noise. How we measure–1484
Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. This is a judgement, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure7,6 / 107,9 / 10
Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure15281677
API price in, per 1M$1.25$2
API price out, per 1M$4.25$6
Entry price (subscription)on requeston request
Businesson requeston request
Context windowup to 10M tokens1M tokens
ModalitiesText, Image, CodeText, Image, Audio, Video
EU hostingYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
No training (business)YesNo
GDPR profileOur summary of what the provider itself publishes about your data. For a professional tool: whether the data is stored in the EU, whether there is a certification or GDPR guarantee, and whether the provider is based in the Netherlands or the EU. For a general model: EU hosting, no training on your data and self-hosting. From Strong to Unknown; Caution only for a model with a documented problem. How we measureCautionCaution

Source: LMArena, OpenRouter · retrieved 9 November 2026

Choose Llama if…

  • open weights that you can fully self-host matter to you
  • fine-tuning on your own data matters to you
  • privacy and GDPR weigh heavily

Choose Qwen if…

  • you value its very broad range: from free open-weight models (Apache 2.0) to a 1M-context flagship
  • you value competitive API prices via Alibaba Cloud Model Studio

Frequently asked questions

By field

Which is better: Llama or Qwen?

On combined quality (LMArena Elo plus our editorial score), Qwen comes out higher, but the right choice depends on your field and requirements: Llama may suit you better on price or privacy. See the table above.

Which is better for privacy and GDPR: Llama or Qwen?

Llama scores stronger here (EU hosting, on-premise and no training on your data). Llama: self-hosting gives you full data control within your own EU infrastructure, a strong GDPR argument.

Which is cheaper: Llama or Qwen?

The entry prices are close together. Always check the current prices, as they change often.

Every Friday: what changed in AI for your field

New models, prices, oversight and tools, with sources and what it means for you. One email a week, unsubscribe with one click.

View a sample

We only use your address for this newsletter. You confirm first by email.