Home / Compare / GLM (Z.ai) vs Llama

GLM (Z.ai) vs Llama

In short: Llama is not listed on LMArena, so no independent quality comparison is possible; on our editorial score they are level, Llama is stronger on privacy and GDPR, and Llama's entry price is not public.

GLM (Z.ai)Z.ai (Zhipu AI)
1483EloGDPR: Caution

3 of 5 criteria with a clear difference

vs
LlamaMeta
–EloGDPR: Caution

2 of 5 criteria with a clear difference

GLM (Z.ai)The showdownLlama
1622Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure1528
7.7Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. An assessment, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure7.6
$1.4Price out per 1M (lower is better)$4.25

A bar fills towards the model's side; yellow is a clear difference, grey falls within the margin of measurement.

CriterionGLM (Z.ai)Llama
Quality (Elo)Quality from blind duels on LMArena: users choose between two anonymous answers. A difference of about 20 points is noticeable, a few points is noise. How we measure1483–
Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. This is a judgement, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure7,7 / 107,6 / 10
Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure16221528
API price in, per 1M$0.07$1.25
API price out, per 1M$1.4$4.25
Entry price (subscription)$18 / monthon request
Businesson requeston request
Context window1M tokensup to 10M tokens
ModalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Code
EU hostingNoYes
Self-hostableYesYes
No training (business)NoYes
GDPR profileOur summary of what the provider itself publishes about your data. For a professional tool: whether the data is stored in the EU, whether there is a certification or GDPR guarantee, and whether the provider is based in the Netherlands or the EU. For a general model: EU hosting, no training on your data and self-hosting. From Strong to Unknown; Caution only for a model with a documented problem. How we measureCautionCaution

Source: LMArena, OpenRouter · retrieved 9 November 2026

Choose GLM (Z.ai) if…

  • top performance on coding and agent benchmarks at a fraction of the price matters to you
  • a fully open-weight GLM-5.2 under the MIT licence matters to you

Choose Llama if…

  • open weights that you can fully self-host matter to you
  • fine-tuning on your own data matters to you
  • privacy and GDPR weigh heavily

Frequently asked questions

By field

Which is better: GLM (Z.ai) or Llama?

On combined quality (LMArena Elo plus our editorial score), GLM (Z.ai) comes out higher, but the right choice depends on your field and requirements: Llama may suit you better on price or privacy. See the table above.

Which is better for privacy and GDPR: GLM (Z.ai) or Llama?

Llama scores more strongly here (EU hosting, on-premise and no training on your data). GLM (Z.ai): The international service Z.ai runs through JINGSHENG HENGXING TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD. (Singapore); personal data is in principle processed in Singapore. According to the data processing agreement, API content is processed in real time and not stored. GLM-5.2 is open-weight under MIT and can therefore be fully self-hosted or hosted via an EU provider.

Which is cheaper: GLM (Z.ai) or Llama?

The entry prices are close together. Always check the current prices, as they change often.

Every Friday: what changed in AI for your field

New models, prices, oversight and tools, with sources and what it means for you. One email a week, unsubscribe with one click.

View a sample

We only use your address for this newsletter. You confirm first by email.