Home / Compare / Le Chat (Mistral) vs Qwen

Le Chat (Mistral) vs Qwen

In short: Qwen comes out higher on quality (Elo and editorial score combined), Le Chat (Mistral) is stronger on privacy and GDPR, and the entry price of Qwen is not public.

Le Chat (Mistral)Mistral AI
1426EloGDPR: Strong

5 of 7 criteria with a clear difference

vs
QwenAlibaba Cloud
1484EloGDPR: Caution

2 of 7 criteria with a clear difference

Le Chat (Mistral)The showdownQwen
1426Quality (Elo)Quality from blind duels on LMArena: users choose between two anonymous answers. You notice a difference of about 20 points; a few points is noise. How we measure1484
1563Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure1677
8.4Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. An assessment, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure7.9
$2.1Price out per 1M (lower is better)$6

A bar fills towards the model's side; yellow is a clear difference, grey falls within the margin of measurement.

CriterionLe Chat (Mistral)Qwen
Quality (Elo)Quality from blind duels on LMArena: users choose between two anonymous answers. A difference of about 20 points is noticeable, a few points is noise. How we measure14261484
Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. This is a judgement, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure8,4 / 107,9 / 10
Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure15631677
API price in, per 1M$0.7$2
API price out, per 1M$2.1$6
Entry price (subscription)$14.99 / monthon request
Businessfrom $24.99 / seat (Team / API / Enterprise)on request
Context window256K tokens1M tokens
ModalitiesText, Image, Code, SpeechText, Image, Audio, Video
EU hostingYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
No training (business)YesNo
GDPR profileOur summary of what the provider itself publishes about your data. For a professional tool: whether the data is stored in the EU, whether there is a certification or GDPR guarantee, and whether the provider is based in the Netherlands or the EU. For a general model: EU hosting, no training on your data and self-hosting. From Strong to Unknown; Caution only for a model with a documented problem. How we measureStrongCaution

Source: LMArena, OpenRouter · retrieved 9 November 2026

Choose Le Chat (Mistral) if…

  • being European and GDPR-native (Paris, CNIL) matters to you
  • open weights (Apache 2.0) and no lock-in matter to you
  • privacy and GDPR weigh heavily

Choose Qwen if…

  • you value its very broad range: from free open-weight models (Apache 2.0) to a 1M-context flagship
  • you value competitive API prices via Alibaba Cloud Model Studio
  • you want the highest overall quality

Frequently asked questions

By field

Which is better: Le Chat (Mistral) or Qwen?

On the combined quality (LMArena Elo + our editorial score), Qwen comes out higher, but the right choice depends on your field and requirements: Le Chat (Mistral) may suit you better on price or privacy. See the table above.

Which is better for privacy and GDPR: Le Chat (Mistral) or Qwen?

Le Chat (Mistral) scores stronger here (EU hosting, on-premise and no training on your data). Le Chat (Mistral): data is stored in the EU by default (Paris cloud, plus EU regions via Bedrock/Azure/Vertex). Open models run entirely in your own environment. Pro/Team/Enterprise and API do not train on your data.

Which is cheaper: Le Chat (Mistral) or Qwen?

The entry prices are close together. Always check the current prices, as they change often.

Every Friday: what changed in AI for your field

New models, prices, oversight and tools, with sources and what it means for you. One email a week, unsubscribe with one click.

View a sample

We only use your address for this newsletter. You confirm first by email.