Home / Compare / Llama vs Le Chat (Mistral)

Llama vs Le Chat (Mistral)

In short: Llama is not on LMArena, so no independent quality comparison is possible; on our editorial score Le Chat (Mistral) comes out higher, the two are close on privacy, and the entry price of Llama is not public.

LlamaMeta
–EloGDPR: Caution

0 of 5 criteria with a clear difference

vs
Le Chat (Mistral)Mistral AI
1426EloGDPR: Strong

5 of 5 criteria with a clear difference

LlamaThe duelLe Chat (Mistral)
1528Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure1563
7.6Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. An assessment, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure8.4
$4.25Price out per 1M (lower is better)$2.1

A bar fills towards the model's side; yellow is a clear difference, grey falls within the margin of measurement.

CriterionLlamaLe Chat (Mistral)
Quality (Elo)Quality from blind duels on LMArena: users choose between two anonymous answers. A difference of about 20 points is noticeable, a few points is noise. How we measure–1426
Editorial scoreOur own assessment on 10 of suitability for professional work, price and privacy. This is a judgement, not a measurement; that is why it always sits alongside the Elo. How we measure7,6 / 108,4 / 10
Code EloThe same blind duels on LMArena, but only with programming tasks. How we measure15281563
API price in, per 1M$1.25$0.7
API price out, per 1M$4.25$2.1
Entry price (subscription)on request$14.99 / month
Businesson requestfrom $24.99 / seat (Team / API / Enterprise)
Context windowup to 10M tokens256K tokens
ModalitiesText, Image, CodeText, Image, Code, Speech
EU hostingYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
No training (business)YesYes
GDPR profileOur summary of what the provider itself publishes about your data. For a professional tool: whether the data is stored in the EU, whether there is a certification or GDPR guarantee, and whether the provider is based in the Netherlands or the EU. For a general model: EU hosting, no training on your data and self-hosting. From Strong to Unknown; Caution only for a model with a documented problem. How we measureCautionStrong

Source: LMArena, OpenRouter · retrieved 9 November 2026

Choose Llama if…

  • open weights that you can fully self-host matter to you
  • fine-tuning on your own data matters to you

Choose Le Chat (Mistral) if…

  • being European and GDPR-native (Paris, CNIL) matters to you
  • open weights (Apache 2.0) and no lock-in matter to you

Frequently asked questions

By field

Which is better: Llama or Le Chat (Mistral)?

On combined quality (LMArena Elo plus our editorial score), Le Chat (Mistral) comes out higher, but the right choice depends on your field and requirements: Llama may suit you better on price or privacy. See the table above.

Which is better for privacy and GDPR: Llama or Le Chat (Mistral)?

The two are close (EU hosting, on-premise and no training on your data). Llama: Self-hosting gives full data control within your own EU infrastructure, a strong GDPR argument.

Which is cheaper: Llama or Le Chat (Mistral)?

The entry prices are close together. Always check the current prices, as they change often.

Every Friday: what changed in AI for your field

New models, prices, oversight and tools, with sources and what it means for you. One email a week, unsubscribe with one click.

View a sample

We only use your address for this newsletter. You confirm first by email.